🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers introduced a new playlist called Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but includes several key changes:

• Every squad has just 8 human participants, with the remaining made up of 32 bots.
• Actions done by human gamers grant complete experience points, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Only two maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Features like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, the playlist lives up to its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume it's a good idea, as it gives additional choices for gamers seeking alternative methods to have fun with the title. However, if video games has shown one thing, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Player Reactions: From Fury to Support

"People want human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," reads one reply to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," says a different user. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are headed with this game," while another details all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, for every complaint, some gamers explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to practice, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are players who have lives and can't play this title all the time. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds another. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is perfect for me," while another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Player Input

All that said, players have valid points to complain about the new mode. Some users have highlighted that it could increase wait times even longer for other modes because of the sheer number of options in the game already. Similarly, some areas often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a required amount of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to provide complete rewards, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. Thus this new playlist seems like the player base meeting them in the middle, according to forum feedback. A different user labels this mode as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they will not hesitate to change it again.