🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that may create up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, grants a request by the state to lift a district court's block that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating much confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its action.

The district court had determined that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries established after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Strong Opposition

Through a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was actually authored by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a violation of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling is part of a nationwide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican majority. Usually, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

Conversely, Democratic officials criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

Another leading Democratic figure argued the court had yet again eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.