🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare it to what average US resident spends. I know multiple businesses who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When including those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation is that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.